Case 4 · dairy distribution

Buying a competitor four times bigger, in a falling market, with its own money

Real story
A real company, real people, real numbers. Only the company's name is hidden.
The question

A chance to buy a company four times his size

An owner of a dairy distributor came to me with a question. The market was tough, and many companies were in losses. He had a chance to acquire a company from the same market, four times bigger than his own business: 800 people against his 200.

The problem was that he had the resources to pay only 20% of the price needed to get control. His ability to raise more capital for the deal was very limited, and he wanted to reduce his risk before jumping in.

4× bigger his company · the one for sale what he could paythe rest of the price
What the reports told me

At least make sure he isn't buying losses

He asked me to take the company's reporting, understand what could be improved and on what timeline. I got access to the P&Ls and the balance sheet, a hardly responsive executive team that was afraid of any changes, and a limited timeline to make the decision.

The reports had the same problem as in Case 1: they were built on cash basis accounting, so the real numbers were hard to measure. There was no time and no resources to fix the reporting first. But I had a ton of experience from Case 1, and that helped me make an estimation without it.

Inventory cover could be cut in half
TodayPossible
It was mostly cheese, which can be stored for a long time. They had stocked up planning for growth, and then found themselves on a down trajectory. So: we could free up money from the warehouse.
Logistics costs could be decreased
TodayPossible
So: we could cut costs by optimizing business processes.
Part of the business could be reduced without harm to profits
fallback
So: a fallback option. Cut part of the business and get more cash from turnover in case something went wrong.
Our plan

Pay 20% now, and the rest from the warehouse

It was a falling market, and the seller was afraid of the losses he was generating.

PAYMENTSWAREHOUSE Signing The year after we get control the remaining 80%, paid during the year money freedfrom the warehouse stock improve management, operations and finance merge
The plan in four steps · numbered on the diagram
  1. 1Step 1Structure the deal as an initial 20% prepayment, with all the rest paid during the year after we get control over the business.
  2. 2Step 2Reduce inventory cover by optimizing operations, and use the money from there to pay for the deal.
  3. 3Step 3Use this time to improve management, operations and finance. All together it was an obvious path to get above the waterline.
  4. 4Step 4Then get the benefits of merging the existing profitable business with the giant we acquired.
How it went

Inventory cover went from 50 days to 25

BEFOREAFTER paid the full remaining 80% of the price

In other words, we bought the company with its own money.

How we did it

We introduced delivery from the wheels: part of the goods came in during the day and were collected and delivered the same night. It required changing the rhythm of supply, re-negotiating contracts and improving how reliable our logistics were.

The risk

This step added a lot of risk. If anything failed in the processes, all our biggest clients would put fines on us for failed deliveries or for goods with too little shelf life left.

The team

During that year some of the executive team stayed, and some were replaced or let go.

The fallback

We never needed it. In the end we only slightly optimized that part of the business and kept it.

The result

The merged company is the market leader now

beforeafter the merger

The merger brought its own savings:

  • The same warehouse
  • The same office
  • Less headcount in total
  • Better financial terms with the banks
My role

Structure the deal, prepare the negotiations and restructure the team in the acquired company. It was almost a two-year engagement.

Case 4 · dairy distribution

Buying a competitor four times bigger, in a falling market, with its own money

Real story
A real company, real people, real numbers. Only the company's name is hidden.
The question

A chance to buy a company four times his size

An owner of a dairy distributor came to me with a question. The market was tough, and many companies were in losses. He had a chance to acquire a company from the same market, four times bigger than his own business: 800 people against his 200.

The problem was that he had the resources to pay only 20% of the price needed to get control. His ability to raise more capital for the deal was very limited, and he wanted to reduce his risk before jumping in.

4× bigger his company · the one for sale what he could paythe rest of the price
What the reports told me

At least make sure he isn't buying losses

He asked me to take the company's reporting, understand what could be improved and on what timeline. I got access to the P&Ls and the balance sheet, a hardly responsive executive team that was afraid of any changes, and a limited timeline to make the decision.

The reports had the same problem as in Case 1: they were built on cash basis accounting, so the real numbers were hard to measure. There was no time and no resources to fix the reporting first. But I had a ton of experience from Case 1, and that helped me make an estimation without it.

Inventory cover could be cut in half
TodayPossible
It was mostly cheese, which can be stored for a long time. They had stocked up planning for growth, and then found themselves on a down trajectory. So: we could free up money from the warehouse.
Logistics costs could be decreased
TodayPossible
So: we could cut costs by optimizing business processes.
Part of the business could be reduced without harm to profits
fallback
So: a fallback option. Cut part of the business and get more cash from turnover in case something went wrong.
Our plan

Pay 20% now, and the rest from the warehouse

It was a falling market, and the seller was afraid of the losses he was generating.

PAYMENTSWAREHOUSE stock the remaining 80%, paid duringthe year after we get control,with money freed from the warehouse
The plan in four steps · numbered on the diagram
  1. 1Structure the deal as an initial 20% prepayment, with all the rest paid during the year after we get control over the business.
  2. 2Reduce inventory cover by optimizing operations, and use the money from there to pay for the deal.
  3. 3Use this time to improve management, operations and finance. All together it was an obvious path to get above the waterline.
  4. 4Then get the benefits of merging the existing profitable business with the giant we acquired.
How it went

Inventory cover went from 50 days to 25

BEFOREAFTER paid the full remaining80% of the price

In other words, we bought the company with its own money.

How we did it

We introduced delivery from the wheels: part of the goods came in during the day and were collected and delivered the same night. It required changing the rhythm of supply, re-negotiating contracts and improving how reliable our logistics were.

The risk

This step added a lot of risk. If anything failed in the processes, all our biggest clients would put fines on us for failed deliveries or for goods with too little shelf life left.

The team

During that year some of the executive team stayed, and some were replaced or let go.

The fallback

We never needed it. In the end we only slightly optimized that part of the business and kept it.

The result

The merged company is the market leader now

beforeafter the merger

The merger brought its own savings:

  • The same warehouse
  • The same office
  • Less headcount in total
  • Better financial terms with the banks
My role

Structure the deal, prepare the negotiations and restructure the team in the acquired company. It was almost a two-year engagement.